feat(platform-ui): 新增审核指挥台V2原型

apps/platform_ui/services.py

@@ -128,6 +128,176 @@ def get_platform_demo_context():
         {"time": "09:39", "title": "一致性检查", "detail": "检测到产品名称和样本类型存在跨文档冲突，升级为人工复核。"},
         {"time": "09:42", "title": "风险输出", "detail": "生成 3 条风险项、2 条补件建议与 1 条责任人通知任务。"},
     ]
+    command_batch = {
+        "id": "2025IVD-CL-0520-001",
+        "status": "进行中",
+        "workflow": "境内第三类",
+        "class": "III 类",
+        "created_at": "2025-05-20",
+        "applicant": "某某生物科技有限公司",
+        "reviewer": "张审评员",
+        "role": "审评专家",
+        "standard": "《体外诊断试剂注册与备案管理办法》及配套技术指导原则",
+        "version": "V2.1（2025-04-01）",
+    }
+    command_metrics = [
+        {
+            "key": "completeness",
+            "label": "资料包完整性得分",
+            "value": "68",
+            "suffix": "/100",
+            "level": "较差",
+            "detail": "上次得分 61（2025-05-19）",
+        },
+        {
+            "key": "health",
+            "label": "资料包健康度",
+            "value": "62",
+            "suffix": "项检查项",
+            "segments": [
+                {"label": "完整", "value": "28", "hint": "45%"},
+                {"label": "部分缺失", "value": "18", "hint": "29%"},
+                {"label": "缺失", "value": "16", "hint": "26%"},
+            ],
+        },
+        {
+            "key": "risk",
+            "label": "风险分布",
+            "value": "22",
+            "suffix": "项风险",
+            "segments": [
+                {"label": "高风险", "value": "3", "tone": "danger"},
+                {"label": "中风险", "value": "7", "tone": "warning"},
+                {"label": "低风险", "value": "12", "tone": "success"},
+            ],
+        },
+        {
+            "key": "progress",
+            "label": "审核进度",
+            "value": "46",
+            "suffix": "%",
+            "detail": "已完成 24 / 52 项任务",
+        },
+    ]
+    command_flow = [
+        {"step": "1", "title": "资料准备", "date": "2025-05-20", "state": "done"},
+        {"step": "2", "title": "形式审查", "date": "2025-05-21", "state": "done"},
+        {"step": "3", "title": "技术审评", "date": "进行中", "state": "active"},
+        {"step": "4", "title": "核查检验", "date": "待开始", "state": "todo"},
+        {"step": "5", "title": "综合评审", "date": "待开始", "state": "todo"},
+        {"step": "6", "title": "行政审批", "date": "待开始", "state": "todo"},
+        {"step": "7", "title": "制证发证", "date": "待开始", "state": "todo"},
+    ]
+    command_tabs = [
+        {"id": "completeness", "label": "注册完整性核查"},
+        {"id": "consistency", "label": "字段一致性"},
+        {"id": "risk", "label": "风险准入结论"},
+        {"id": "evidence", "label": "证据引用"},
+        {"id": "feishu", "label": "飞书通知状态"},
+    ]
+    command_checks = [
+        {
+            "chapter": "1.产品基本信息",
+            "item": "产品名称",
+            "rule": "办法 第十条",
+            "status": "完整",
+            "risk": "低风险",
+            "problem": "-",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "1.产品基本信息",
+            "item": "预期用途",
+            "rule": "办法 第十条",
+            "status": "完整",
+            "risk": "低风险",
+            "problem": "-",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "2.综述资料",
+            "item": "产品描述",
+            "rule": "指导原则4.2.1",
+            "status": "完整",
+            "risk": "低风险",
+            "problem": "-",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "2.综述资料",
+            "item": "作用原理",
+            "rule": "指导原则4.2.2",
+            "status": "部分缺失",
+            "risk": "中风险",
+            "problem": "缺少关键原理图及验证数据说明",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "3.研究资料",
+            "item": "分析性能评估",
+            "rule": "指导原则5.3.1",
+            "status": "部分缺失",
+            "risk": "中风险",
+            "problem": "线性范围验证数据不完整",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "3.研究资料",
+            "item": "阳性判断值",
+            "rule": "指导原则5.3.2",
+            "status": "缺失",
+            "risk": "高风险",
+            "problem": "未提供阳性判断值确定依据",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "4.临床评价资料",
+            "item": "临床试验方案",
+            "rule": "指导原则6.2.1",
+            "status": "完整",
+            "risk": "低风险",
+            "problem": "-",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "4.临床评价资料",
+            "item": "临床试验报告",
+            "rule": "指导原则6.2.2",
+            "status": "部分缺失",
+            "risk": "中风险",
+            "problem": "有效性结果分析不完整",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "4.临床评价资料",
+            "item": "不良事件汇总分析",
+            "rule": "指导原则6.2.4",
+            "status": "缺失",
+            "risk": "高风险",
+            "problem": "未提供不良事件汇总分析报告",
+        },
+        {
+            "chapter": "5.生产资料",
+            "item": "生产工艺验证",
+            "rule": "指导原则7.2.3",
+            "status": "完整",
+            "risk": "低风险",
+            "problem": "-",
+        },
+    ]
+    key_risks = [
+        {"title": "阳性判断值确定依据缺失", "level": "高风险"},
+        {"title": "不良事件汇总分析报告缺失", "level": "高风险"},
+        {"title": "临床试验方案偏离未充分说明", "level": "中风险"},
+    ]
+    next_actions = [
+        {"title": "退回企业补充资料", "detail": "需企业补充 3 项高风险资料", "state": "待处理", "tone": "danger"},
+        {"title": "补充说明或澄清", "detail": "需企业说明 7 项中风险问题", "state": "待处理", "tone": "warning"},
+        {"title": "进入核查检验环节（可选）", "detail": "风险可控后进入下一环节", "state": "待处理", "tone": "success"},
+    ]
+    owners = [
+        {"role": "审评专家", "name": "张审评员", "status": "当前处理人"},
+        {"role": "审核组长", "name": "李组长", "status": "待确认"},
+        {"role": "法规专员", "name": "王法规", "status": "协同处理"},
+        {"role": "临床专家", "name": "陈专家", "status": "协同处理"},
+    ]
+    operation_logs = [
+        {"time": "2025-05-21 10:24", "actor": "张审评员", "action": "发起完整性核查"},
+        {"time": "2025-05-21 10:26", "actor": "Agent Core", "action": "命中 62 项检查规则"},
+        {"time": "2025-05-21 10:28", "actor": "Agent Core", "action": "生成风险准入结论"},
+    ]
     knowledge_filters = [
         {"label": "全部", "active": True},
         {"label": "法规依据", "active": False},
@@ -169,4 +339,13 @@ def get_platform_demo_context():
         "mcp_connectors": mcp_connectors,
         "skills": skills,
         "workflow_steps": workflow_steps,
+        "command_batch": command_batch,
+        "command_metrics": command_metrics,
+        "command_flow": command_flow,
+        "command_tabs": command_tabs,
+        "command_checks": command_checks,
+        "key_risks": key_risks,
+        "next_actions": next_actions,
+        "owners": owners,
+        "operation_logs": operation_logs,
     }

apps/platform_ui/urls.py

@@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ urlpatterns = [
     path("mcp-center/", views.mcp_center, name="mcp-center"),
     path("skills/", views.skill_studio, name="skills"),
     path("command-center/", views.command_center, name="command-center"),
+    path("command-center-v2/", views.command_center_v2, name="command-center-v2"),
 ]

apps/platform_ui/views.py

@@ -21,3 +21,8 @@ def skill_studio(request):
 def command_center(request):
     context = get_platform_demo_context()
     return render(request, "platform_ui/command_center.html", context)
+
+
+def command_center_v2(request):
+    context = get_platform_demo_context()
+    return render(request, "platform_ui/command_center_v2.html", context)

design-qa.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+**Findings**
+- No actionable P0/P1/P2 findings remain.
+
+**Open Questions**
+- The source visual is an Image Gen concept rather than a pixel-locked Figma file, so exact icon glyphs and logo geometry were implemented as code-native UI marks. The final prototype preserves the selected direction's hierarchy, density, risk states, and operational layout.
+
+**Implementation Checklist**
+- Source visual truth path: `C:\Users\bruce\.codex\generated_images\019e8bb8-b097-72b3-9c89-97cfca019c7c\ig_0fe578f839e33933016a1fae76771c81918c954bf5cbfe72d2.png`
+- Implementation screenshot path: `D:\Code\DEMO-AGENT\output\playwright\command-center-v2-desktop.png`
+- Mobile screenshot path: `D:\Code\DEMO-AGENT\output\playwright\command-center-v2-mobile.png`
+- Full-view comparison evidence: `D:\Code\DEMO-AGENT\output\playwright\command-center-v2-comparison.png`
+- Viewport: desktop `1440 x 1024`, mobile `390 x 844`
+- State: default command-center workbench; desktop screenshot shows the selected direction's primary dashboard state.
+- Focused region comparison evidence: not separately required; this is a dense dashboard concept and the full-view comparison makes the critical regions visible enough: sidebar, batch strip, metrics, workflow, audit table, and right risk rail.
+- Fonts and typography: Segoe UI / PingFang SC / Microsoft YaHei fallback stack matches the professional enterprise SaaS feel; hierarchy and body sizes are readable, with no negative letter spacing.
+- Spacing and layout rhythm: Desktop uses the same left rail, top context strip, four metric blocks, workflow strip, table region, and right-side risk rail as the source. Mobile switches to stacked sections to avoid cramped table-dashboard density.
+- Colors and visual tokens: Deep navy sidebar, white work surface, cool gray borders, blue primary actions, red/orange/green semantic risk states match the selected visual direction.
+- Image quality and asset fidelity: The source concept did not require product photos or decorative raster assets. The implementation uses lightweight UI marks and CSS primitives appropriate for a Django dashboard prototype.
+- Copy and content: Chinese labels are aligned to the requirements: NMPA IVD review, registration batch, completeness check, risk gate, evidence, Feishu notification, responsible owners, and audit trail.
+- Patches made since previous QA pass: added mobile wrapping for the header and batch strip, converted mobile actions to a single-column grid, adjusted the health legend, and suppressed horizontal overflow.
+- final result: passed
+
+**Follow-up Polish**
+- P3: Replace letter-based placeholder nav icons with an icon font or library if the project later adds a frontend asset pipeline.
+- P3: Add separate interactive tab bodies for consistency, evidence, and Feishu cards if the prototype needs a longer live demo script.